The assessee forex agents in mumbai 15,000 shares in Dorf Ketal Chemicals Pvt. Pursuant to a further issue, it was allotted 1,94,000 shares at the face value rate of Rs. 100 each, on a proportionate basis.
The AO held that as the book value of the shares was Rs. HUF receives any property for a consideration which is less than the FMV of the property, the difference shall be assessed as income of the recipient. Though the allotment of the shares was not done as of 31. 2006, the number of shares to be allotted to the employees as on 31.
2006 was specified and immediately thereafter the said shares were so allotted. Rights basis, on the strength of existing shareholding in the Company, comes into existence when the Company decides to come out with the Rights Offer. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Supermax Personal Care Private Limited vs. Electronics Corporation of India Ltd vs.
148: If the reopening is based on information received from the investigation dept, the reasons must show that the AO independently applied his mind to the information and formed his own opinion. If the reopening is done mechanically, it is void. Also, if the reasons refer to any document, a copy should be provided to the assessee. No independent application of mind by the AO to the material forming the basis of the reasons recorded is evincible from the reasons.
The AO, in the reasons, has just stated the information received and his conclusion about the alleged escapement of income. As to what the AO did with the information made available to him, is not discernible from the reasons. The AO had held that a multi layered holding structure was deliberately created to avoid taxes in India and to conceal the information about the ultimate beneficiaries. India in itself cannot be held against an assessee. Because of advancement of technology, the globe has become a villge. So, the nature of business has changed a lot.
In our humble opinion, assessees are free to decide the manner in which they want to run their businesses. Limited scrutiny: The CBDT Circulars which restrict the right of the AO in limited scrutiny cases apply only in cases where the AO seeks to do comprehensive scrutiny to find if there is potential escapement of income on other issues. The limitation period for filing a Rectification Application has to be computed from the date of “communication” of the order and not from the date of passing the order. The fact that the order was pronounced in open court is not relevant because the parties will not be aware of the mistakes therein until after perusal of the order.
So far as the arguments of the Ld. It is equally well settled that the notice of reopening can be supported on the basis of reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer. The third principle of law which is equally well settled and which would apply in the present case is that reopening of the assessment would not be permitted for a fishing or a roving inquiry. Finance Act 2012 with retrospective effect from 01. 1962 has bearing while ascertaining payments made to non-residents is taxable under the Act or not. However, it does not change the fundamental principle that there is an obligation to deduct TDS only if the sum is chargeable to tax under the Act. It is indisputably true that such explanation inserted with retrospective effect provides that obligation to comply with subsection of Section 195 would extend to any person resident or non-resident, whether or not non-resident person has a residence or place of business or business connections in India or any other persons in any manner whatsoever in India.